By Dom Nozzi
A superb, must-read article describing the grim, isolating future that a great many older Americans face appeared in the fall of 2018. The article noted that the suburban lifestyle will greatly diminish the ability for most seniors in the US to be able to make trips from their homes. They will, in effect, be trapped in their homes as they will be unable to visit friends, shop for food or other household needs, visit a doctor, or visit parks and cultural events.
Self-driving cars won’t be a remedy for a long time, if ever.
I have made many of the points in this article repeatedly over the years.
It is important to catch the point in the article that town planners do NOT have the ability to rectify this important crisis, as US planners have almost no power to implement effective tools. This is largely because most Americans are NIMBYs who fight aggressively to allow no change to their suburban lifestyle. In other words, planners are met with violent, raging opposition from citizens when tactics to escape this grim future are proposed. There is, for example, extreme opposition to more compact, dense development. More narrow, slower-speed street design. Retrofitting bicycling and walking paths. And mixing homes with offices and retail.
This is ultimately quite tragic, as many will regret their diminished lack of future travel independence.
As I have noted a number of times, I’m convinced that only a severe economic, environmental, climate or resource downturn will give us the kick in the ass we need to change. Unfortunately, it has also been said by someone else that throughout history, whenever a society had to choose between extinction (maintaining its lifestyle) or sustainability (thru making substantial changes in lifestyle), the society in question has ALWAYS chosen extinction.
What makes the extinction of the American way of life so likely is that unlike past societies, ours is uniquely locked into a self-perpetuating car-centric suburban land use pattern at the local level and the military-industrial complex at the federal level.
A recipe for essential reforms at the local level, once a severe kick in the pants emerges, includes…
Removal of required car parking requirements.
Elimination of conventional zoning-based codes with transect-based and form-based codes.
The use of more human-scaled dimensions for streets, intersections and building setbacks.
Putting many roads and intersections on diets (ie, removing excessive road lanes).
Replacing surface parking with buildings.
Replacing free parking and free roads with priced parking and priced roads
Unbundling the price of parking from the price of housing.
Requiring that employers offer employees parking cash-out.
Shifting to a land value tax (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax).
Adopting low design speed street geometries and ending the forgiving street design paradigm.